Publikationen

Monographien Einführungen Sammelbände Aufsätze

Reich, Ingo (to appear). Coordination. In: Krifka, Manfred & Mathias Schenner (eds.), Handbook of Clausal Embedding. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Reich, Ingo, Robin Lemke & Lisa Schäfer (to appear). Questions under discussion, salience and the acceptability of fragments. In: Konietzko, Andreas & Susanne Winkler (eds.): Information Structure and Discourse in Generative Grammar: Mechanisms and Processes. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Reich, Ingo (2022): Was ist ein komplexer Satz? In: Wöllstein, Angelika und Dudenredaktion (Hgg): Duden. Die Grammatik. 10., völlig neu verfasste Auflage. 144–184. 

Reich, Ingo (2022): Parenthesen. In: Wöllstein, Angelika und Dudenredaktion (Hgg): Duden. Die Grammatik. 10., völlig neu verfasste Auflage. 189–190.

Reich, Ingo (2022): Auslassungen. In: Wöllstein, Angelika und Dudenredaktion (Hgg): Duden. Die Grammatik. 10., völlig neu verfasste Auflage. 191–206.

Gergel, Remus, Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (2022): Introduction. In: Gergel, Remus, Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds.): Particles in German, English and Beyond. New York, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–24

Lemke, Robin, Lisa Schäfer & Ingo Reich (2022). Can Identity Conditions on Ellipsis be Explained by Processing Principles? In: R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim, A. Konietzko & S. Featherston (eds.). Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2020: Linguistic Theory Enriched by Experimental Data. 541–561. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.

Reich, Ingo (2022): Bedeutungstheorien. In: Klabunde, Ralf, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefanie Dipper (Hgg.). Linguistik im Sprachvergleich: Germanistik – Romanistik – Anglistik. Stuttgart: Metzler. 389–412.

Lemke, Robin, Ingo Reich, Lisa Schäfer & Heiner Drenhaus (2021): Predictable Words Are More Likely to Be Omitted in Fragments–Evidence From Production Data. Frontiers in Psychology 12.

Schäfer, Lisa, Robin Lemke, Heiner Drenhaus & Ingo Reich (2021). The Role of UID for the Usage of Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Psycholinguistic Evidence from Length and Context Effects. Frontiers in Psychology. 

Lemke, Robin, Lisa Schäfer & Ingo Reich (2021). Modeling the predictive potential of extralinguistic context with script knowledge. The case of fragments. In: PLoS One 16(2).

Reich, Ingo (2020). Banning the disjunction of speech acts. In: Theoretical Linguistics 46(1-2), 113–121.

Lemke, Robin, Lisa Schäfer, Heiner Drenhaus and Ingo Reich (2020). Script Knowledge Constrains Ellipses in Fragments – Evidence from Production Data and Language Modeling. In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics:. Vol. 3, Article 45.

Reich, Ingo (2019). Saulecker und supergemütlich! Pilotstudien zur fragmentarischen Verwendung expressiver Adjektive. In: d’Avis, Franz & Rita Finkbeiner (eds.): Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 109-128.

Reich, Ingo (2018). Ellipsen. In: Liedtke, Frank & Astrid Tuchen (Hgg.): Handbuch Pragmatik, Stuttgart: Metzler. 240-251.

Horch, E. & Ingo Reich (2017b). The Fragment Corpus (FraC). In Proceedings of the 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham (UK).

Lemke, Robin, Eva Horch & Ingo Reich (2017a). Optimal Encoding! – Information Theory Constrains Article Omission in Newspaper Headlines. In Proceedings of EACL 2017, Volume 2, Short Papers, 131-135. Valencia (E).

Reich, Ingo (2017). On the Omission of Articles and Copulae in German Newspaper Headlines. Linguistic Variation, 17(2). 186-204.

Horch, Eva & Ingo Reich (2016). On ‘article omission’ in German and the ‘uniform information density hypothesis’. In S. Dipper, F. Neubarth, and H. Zinsmeister, eds., Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2016), Bochumer Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 16. 125–127. Bochum (D).

Speyer, Augustin & Ingo Reich (2016). `Introduction: Alternations in Co- and Subordinations.‘ In Reich & Speyer (2016), 5–20.

Reich, Ingo & Marga Reis (2013). ‘Koordination und Subordination.’ In: J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (Hgg), Satztypen des Deutschen. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 536-569.

Reich, Ingo (2013). ‘Asymmetrische Koordination.’ In: J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (Hgg), Satztypen des Deutschen. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 356-371.

Reich, Ingo (2012). ‘Information Structure and Theoretical Models of Grammar.’ In: M. Krifka & R. Musan (eds), The Expression of Information Structure. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 409-448.

Reich, Ingo (2011). ‘Ellipsis.’ In: C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science). 1849-1874.

Reich, Ingo (2009a). What Asymmetric Coordination in German Tells Us About the Syntax and Semantics of Conditionals. Natural Language Semantics 17, 219-244.

Reich, Ingo (2009b). ‘Ist Asymmetrische Koordination wirklich ein Fall asymmetrischer Koordination?’ In: Ehrich, Veronika et al. (Hgg), Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen. Sonderheft Linguistische Berichte 16. Hamburg: Buske. 203-222.

Reich, Ingo et al. (2009c). ‘Einführung.’ In: Ehrich, Veronika et al. (Hgg), Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen. Sonderheft Linguistische Berichte 16. Hamburg: Buske. 5-20.

Reich, Ingo (2007a). From Phases to ATB-Movement. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 43, 217-232.

Reich, Ingo (2007b). ‘Toward a Uniform Analysis of Short Answers and Gapping.’ In: Schwabe, K. & S. Winkler, eds., On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 467-484. [Stark überarb. Fassung von Reich (2006).]

Reich, Ingo (2007c). What Asymmetric Coordination in German Tells Us About the Syntax and Semantics of Conditionals. In: Estela Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), Proceedings of »Sinn & Bedeutung 11«, Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

Reich, Ingo (2006). ‘Toward a Uniform Analysis of Short Answers and Gapping.’ In: Denis, P., E. McCready, A. Palmer & B. Reese, eds., In: Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Issues at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 69-78.

Reich, Ingo (2004a). ‘Association with Focus and Choice Functions: A Binding Approach.’ In: Research on Language & Computation 2, 463-489.

Reich, Ingo (2004b). ‘Another Look at Exhaustivity Effects and the ‘de dicto’ Reading in Embedded Interrogatives.’ In: I. Comorovski and M. Krifka (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI04-Workshop “Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Questions”, Nancy.

Reich, Ingo (2002a). ‘Question/Answer Congruence and the Semantics of wh-Phrases.’ In: Theoretical Linguistics 28. 73-94.

Reich, Ingo (2002b). ‘Association with Focus, Islands, and Choice Functions: A Binding Approach.’ In: K. von Heusinger, R. Kempson, and W. Meyer-Viol (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Choice Functions and Natural Language Semantics”, Arbeitspapier 110. Universität Konstanz. 167-188.

Reich, Ingo (2002c). ‘Pied Piping and the Syntax and Semantics of Complex wh-Phrases.’ In: S. Mauck and J. Mittelstaedt (eds.), Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Volume 2 (2002). Georgetown University. 263-286.

Reich, Ingo (2001). ‘Question/Answer Congruence and the Semantics of wh-Phrases.’ In: K. von Heusinger and K. Schwabe (eds.), Information Structure and the Referential Status of Linguistic Expressions. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 23. 181-195.

Poster

Lemke, R., Horch, E., and Reich, I. (2017a). Article Omission in Newspaper Headlines is Constrained by Information Density – An Experimental and Corpus-Based Approach. In Proceedings of CUNY 2017, Cambridge, MA. Poster.

Lemke, Robin, Lisa Schäfer & Ingo Reich (2017b). Does Information Theory constrain the usage of fragments? – an experimental study. In Proceedings of AMLaP 2017, Lancaster (UK). Poster.

Rezensionen

Reich, Ingo (2006). Rez. von “ Lerner, Jan & Petra Dünges (2003), ‘Anaphern, Quantoren und Parallelität. Tübingen: G. Narr.” Linguistische Berichte 208, 455-460.

Reich, Ingo (2000). Rez. von “Heim, Irene und Angelika Kratzer (1998), ‘Semantics in Generative Grammar.’ Oxford: Blackwell.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 19, 117-125.